I suppose there are two representative reasons.
1. Hard to learn.
Not as difficult as learning other script based programming for sure. But not as easy as learning Revit. It must be much easier to learn if there are enough resources like the ones of Revit. I expect it should be solved soon or later.
Not as difficult as learning other script based programming for sure. But not as easy as learning Revit. It must be much easier to learn if there are enough resources like the ones of Revit. I expect it should be solved soon or later.
2. Regarded as not very practical yet.
People says that Dynamo has a lot of potential. It can be easily regarded as it's useless yet when we say something has potential. I love computational design. But It's true that there are just few projects which can be treated with computational design in real world. Most of architects are still using traditional design codes or process even though they're using Revit.
People says that Dynamo has a lot of potential. It can be easily regarded as it's useless yet when we say something has potential. I love computational design. But It's true that there are just few projects which can be treated with computational design in real world. Most of architects are still using traditional design codes or process even though they're using Revit.
So I created an example which can make some interests from the architects who are thinking Dynamo has only potential yet.

